Contact 
LEXIKON
Warranty and damages in private sales in insolvency: An overview
In insolvency proceedings, assets such as real estate can be sold by the insolvency administrator on the open market. This process differs from a foreclosure sale and raises a number of legal questions. The issue of warranty is particularly relevant here: What claims does the buyer have if the purchased property does not meet the expected standards? And who bears the costs of necessary repairs or damage remediation? A recent decision by the Supreme Court (OGH, 8 Ob 130/23k) provides important clarification on this issue.
Background to the case
In insolvency proceedings, a property encumbered with mortgages was sold privately. After the handover, the buyer asserted warranty and damage claims because the alpine hut located on the property had suffered damage after the date of the appraisal. The insolvency administrator objected to these claims and referred to the contractually agreed warranty exclusion.
Exclusion of warranty: Does it also apply to private sales?
The central question was therefore whether the exclusion of warranty, as it applies to foreclosure sales in accordance with the Enforcement Code, can also be applied analogously to private sales in insolvency. The buyer argued that the damage had occurred after the appraisal and that he was therefore entitled to assert a claim. The insolvency administrator, on the other hand, referred to the warranty exclusion agreed in the purchase agreement.
However, the Supreme Court did not follow the insolvency administrator’s argument that an analogous application of the Enforcement Code was required. The court ruled that the general law on breach of contract in the General Civil Code (ABGB) applies without restriction to private sales. This means that, despite the warranty exclusion in the purchase agreement, the buyer may be entitled to assert warranty or damage claims under certain circumstances.
Special claims and their significance
The concept of special claims is particularly important in this context. These are claims that must be satisfied from the proceeds of the sale of the property before these proceeds are distributed to the other creditors. The court clarified that the buyer’s warranty claims are to be treated as special claims if they have not already been satisfied by the distribution of the proceeds of sale.
For such a claim to be conclusive, it is sufficient for the buyer to substantiate his claims with a cost estimate. This means that he does not have to prove to the full extent that the damage occurred before the property was handed over in order to file his claim. In this specific case, the purchase agreement had been approved by the court and the buyer had paid the full purchase price before the damage was discovered. The claim for damage repair thus constituted a special claim that had to be taken into account before the proceeds were distributed to the other creditors.
Practical consequences for buyers and insolvency administrators
This decision has significant practical implications for both buyers and insolvency administrators. Buyers should be aware that a contractually agreed warranty exclusion in the case of a private sale does not necessarily mean that they have to waive all claims. It is entirely possible that a warranty claim can be enforced as a special claim, especially if the damage occurred after the appraisal but before the handover.
For insolvency administrators, this means that they must carefully examine whether a warranty exclusion can actually be legally agreed upon in the context of a private sale. The possibility that a buyer may assert claims despite such an exclusion should always be considered. In addition, it is important to insure the properties adequately against damage prior to sale in order to minimize any claims after transfer.
Summary and outlook
The decision of the Supreme Court clarifies that the warranty law of the Austrian Civil Code (ABGB) applies without restriction to private sales in insolvency proceedings. A statutory warranty exclusion, as provided for in foreclosure sales, does not automatically apply here. For buyers, this opens up the possibility of asserting claims even after a private sale in insolvency, provided that corresponding damage occurs. For insolvency administrators, on the other hand, this means increased responsibility in the sale of real estate and an increased duty of care.
The decision shows once again that the sale of real estate in insolvency raises complex legal issues. Sound legal advice is essential for both buyers and insolvency administrators in order to avoid unforeseen liabilities and claims. As a law firm with many years of experience in insolvency law, we are happy to assist you in this matter.